ASCI Connect

 View Only
Back to Library

AI in the Supply Chain 

25 days ago
Statistics
0 Favorited
8 Views
1 Files
0 Shares
0 Downloads
Attachment(s)
pdf file
AI in the Supply Chain   929 KB   1 version
Uploaded - 29-05-2026
 
Download

Comments

GANG PING
12 days ago

What an exceptional and timely study by Schrobback, Irannezhad, and Prato. As a consultant operating at the intersection of AI and logistics with a deep focus on Supply Chain Resilience, I found your behavioral econometric analysis of the Brisbane-Townsville freight corridor incredibly relevant to the challenges our industry faces today.
 
I’d like to share a few perspectives from the field, particularly on how your findings align with the digital transformation and resilience strategies we are currently implementing:
 
Coastal Shipping as a Resilience Buffer: Your point regarding coastal shipping's role in mitigating the risks of road closures due to natural events (cyclones, floods) hits the nail on the head. In my practice, relying on a single dominant land-based mode often creates a "single point of failure" in the supply chain. Coastal shipping shouldn't just be viewed as a cost-alternative; it is a strategic redundancy. By integrating coastal shipping, we can build a more robust, multi-modal network that absorbs shocks from climate-related disruptions.
Quantifying Risk Perception for AI Models: The use of a hybrid choice model to unravel how latent risk variables (internal, market, and immediate risks) interact with cost and delay is brilliant. From an AI perspective, human behavioral biases and risk perceptions are notoriously difficult to model. Your findings provide a fantastic foundational framework. In the AI+Logistics space, we can leverage these insights to build Machine Learning-driven Digital Twins. By feeding these behavioral risk parameters into our algorithms, we can offer dynamic, real-time routing recommendations that don't just optimize for cost and time, but also for "risk appetite."
The Reality of "Attribute Non-Attendance": Your discovery that nearly half of the decision-makers ignore either transport time or cost (or both) is a massive wake-up call for logistics service providers. It mathematically proves what we often see in consulting: B2B freight decisions are heavily influenced by long-term contracts, relationships, and operational inertia, rather than pure transactional metrics. This suggests that future AI pricing and service recommendation engines must be highly personalized, segmenting shippers based on their behavioral archetypes rather than generic market averages.
Moving Forward:
To truly unlock the ~30% potential demand you identified, regulatory reforms (like revisiting cabotage laws) must be paired with technological enablement. If we can build AI-powered visibility platforms that seamlessly integrate sea-freight tracking with land-based logistics, we can overcome the "friction costs" and lack of door-to-door visibility that currently deter shippers.
 
Thank you for providing such robust empirical evidence. It bridges a crucial gap between academic transport economics and practical, tech-enabled supply chain resilience. I look forward to seeing how these insights shape future logistics policies in Queensland and beyond!

Related Entries and Links

No Related Resource entered.